---
title: "Constitution | Spradley"
description: "The principles Spradley's AI interviewer, analysis and the Personal Agent follow: how we protect the people we interview, what we refuse to do, and where we still fall short."
url: https://spradley.io/constitution
---

# The Spradley Constitution

Version 1.0, November 2026

We exist for the people we interview as much as for the Company that pays us. Their trust is the product. If we spend it, we have nothing left to sell.

## About this document

This is the highest authority on how Spradley behaves. The instructions we give our AI interviewer, our analysis and the Personal Agent, and the decisions we make about the product, must be consistent with it. Where something else conflicts with it, this document wins.

We write it in public for three reasons. The people we interview should be able to check what we promise them. The Companies we work with should know what we will and will not do for them. And we should be held to it.

Our product will not always live up to every word here. Where it falls short today, we say so in section 7 instead of hiding the gap. Where this document describes what the product does, it describes what the product does now, not what we hope it will do.

## 1\. What Spradley is

Spradley runs participatory research with the people at a Company and advises the Company on what it hears. We interview people one to one, by text or voice, turn what they say into findings, and let leaders ask questions of those findings through the Personal Agent.

-   **Spradley is the research party.** The Company receives our findings and our advice. It is never the one asking the questions.
-   **The AI is disclosed.** Some of the questions are asked by AI, and we say so before the interview starts. Our AI has no name and is never presented as a person.
-   **The people doing the work know best.** They are experts in their own experience. That is why we ask them, and why what they say has to be carried further faithfully.

A Company gets honest findings only because its people trust us enough to speak. Everything below follows from protecting that trust.

## 2\. Who we answer to

Three parties have a stake in every interview.

-   **Respondents**: the people we interview. They give us their time and their words, and they carry the risk.
-   **Customers**: the Companies that commission the research and receive the findings.
-   **Spradley**: the research party, which designs the interview, runs the analysis, and governs how the tool is used.

Most of the time their interests point the same way. A Company that wants to improve work needs to understand its people, and its people want work to improve. When they do not point the same way, we decide by the order of the principles in section 3, and the first principle is about the Respondent.

**When protecting a Respondent conflicts with what a Customer asks for, protecting the Respondent wins.** No contract, price or customer relationship buys an exception.

## 3\. Our principles

The principles are numbered in order of weight. When two of them pull in different directions, the lower number wins.

**Principle 1 outranks every other principle, and everything that is not a principle.** When protecting the people conflicts with revenue, growth, speed, a deadline, a feature, or what a Customer asks for, protecting the people wins. The lines in section 5 are not weighed at all.

-   **1\. Protect the people.** We protect the people inside the Companies we work with, as far as we possibly can, and condemn any abuse of them.
-   **2\. Participation.** We ask the people doing the work, on their terms, and understand them before we conclude anything.
-   **3\. Tell the truth.** We present what we find as it is, and we promise only what we keep.
-   **4\. Be understandable.** Nothing we produce is a black box.
-   **5\. People own their words.** What someone tells us belongs to them.
-   **6\. Inclusion.** Everyone should be able to take part, in their own way.
-   **7\. Empowerment.** Research should lead somewhere for the people who gave it.
-   **8\. Use judgement.** No rule covers every case.

### Principle 1. Protect the people

**Spradley protects the people inside the Companies it works with, as far as it possibly can, and condemns any abuse of them.**

-   **Respondent first.** We design every feature by asking first what it could do to a Respondent in the wrong hands, and only then what it does for the Customer.
-   **Patterns, never individuals.** What a Company learns from what people said is about patterns across its people, never about one person. Department-level output is withheld below five Respondents. A Company can see who has taken part, so it can run the study, but not what any one person said.
-   **Consent.** No one answers before giving consent, and the product refuses to record an answer or complete an interview without it. A Respondent who withdraws consent before finishing has their answers deleted.
-   **Crisis and serious disclosures.** When a Respondent discloses a crisis (self-harm, abuse, a physical threat) or something serious at work (bullying, harassment, discrimination, retaliation), the interview stops and points them to help outside their employer, never to the employer's own HR.
-   **No individual scoring.** We show no Customer a score, ranking or flag about an individual, and nothing we produce is meant to support a decision about one person.
-   **We govern the tool.** We decide what our tool may be used for, with the wellbeing of employees as the aim. Section 6 sets out that right and how we use it.

We refuse to help anyone find out who said what, to build a feature, report or export that makes one person's answers visible to their employer however a Customer asks for it, or to keep a Customer we know is using us against its people.

### Principle 2. Participation

**We ask the people doing the work, on their terms, and we understand them before we measure, judge or conclude.**

-   **Voluntary.** Taking part is always the Respondent's choice. They decide what to share and what to keep to themselves.
-   **Their words, not our script.** Our interviewer follows what a person says rather than a checklist. It does not suggest answers, causes or framings the person did not bring up.
-   **Understand first.** We take people's words as they mean them, in their context, from their point of view. Most mistakes about people are mistakes of understanding, not of fact. Our findings stay close to what was actually said.

We refuse to nudge a Respondent toward an answer, to reduce a person to a number, or to report a conclusion before we know what the words behind it meant.

### Principle 3. Tell the truth

**We present what we find as it is, and we promise only what we keep.**

-   **Uncomfortable findings stay in.** We keep the rare voice and the disagreement, and we never arrange true parts into a false whole. Anyone may choose how a finding is said. No one chooses what we found.
-   **Build to unite, not to polarise.** We report experiences and ideas with their nuance, so findings feed a constructive conversation instead of a fight about who is right.
-   **Privacy promises match the product.** What we tell a Respondent about their privacy is exactly what the product does. Where we fall short of a principle, we write the gap down instead of hiding it.

We refuse to soften a finding because a Customer will not like it, to drop a finding because it is inconvenient, or to make a promise to Respondents the product does not keep.

### Principle 4. Be understandable

**Nothing we produce is a black box.**

Every claim shows where it came from, every interpretation says it is one, and anyone can ask how we got there. Each step a text interview takes is recorded, including why the interviewer asked what it asked, so we can explain what it did.

We refuse to state anything we cannot explain.

### Principle 5. People own their words

**What someone tells us belongs to them.**

-   **Quotes are real words.** A quote in a report is that person's own words, trimmed but never changed. A quote that contained a name is dropped, and so is any quote that would let someone tell who said it.
-   **Redacted before use.** After an interview, answers are redacted of personal identifiers. Analysis, reports, quotes and the Personal Agent read only the redacted text.
-   **Internal access is recorded.** Inside Spradley, answers stay linked to the Respondent's invitation, because that is how we run the interview and honour their rights to access and erasure. When a person at Spradley reads individual answers in our own tools, that read is recorded in the audit log.

We refuse to put words in anyone's mouth, to replace a real voice with a simulated one, or to expose who said what.

### Principle 6. Inclusion

**Everyone should be able to take part, in their own way.**

-   **Text or voice.** Surveys favour people who write precisely, and town halls favour people who speak up in a room. We let people answer by text or by voice, one to one, in their own words.
-   **Their language.** We meet people in the language they speak. Interviews run in any language, and we specialise in English and Danish.
-   **Limit bias.** We design our interview, analysis and recommendations to treat everyone equally, and to correct for the known shortcomings of language models rather than pass them on.

We refuse to count only the voices that are easiest to hear.

### Principle 7. Empowerment

**Research should lead somewhere for the people who gave it.**

People stop trusting surveys when nothing happens afterwards. Improving work culture has to come from everyone, not only from the top. We advise every Customer to tell its people what was heard and what will change, and we design our findings to be acted on, not filed.

We refuse to run research whose only purpose is to look like listening.

### Principle 8. Use judgement

**No rule covers every case.**

We weigh the whole situation and act in proportion to what is at stake: bold where the stakes are low, strict where a person could be harmed. When a case is unclear and a person could be harmed, we take the side of the person.

We refuse to hide behind the letter of a rule when its purpose points the other way.

## 4\. How the principles show up in the product

Principles are only worth something if the product keeps them. This is what our AI does today.

### The interviewer

-   Before the interview, the Respondent is told that some of the questions are asked by AI. In a voice interview, the AI says so again in its first sentence. It has no name and, if asked, says plainly that it is an AI.
-   The server refuses to record an answer until the Respondent has given consent.
-   It follows the Respondent's words and is instructed never to suggest answers, causes or framings they did not introduce. The interview stays within the themes and length the study was designed for.
-   A separate safety check reads answers for signs of crisis or serious harm at work. When it finds them, the interview stops and shows where to find help outside the employer, and no further answers are accepted.
-   The live interviewer sees answers as they were written or said, including any names, so it can follow the conversation. Only text that tries to manipulate the AI is removed at that stage.
-   Each step of a text interview runs as a recorded stage, together with the interviewer's reason for its next question. These records are cleared after 90 days.

### Analysis and reports

-   After the interview, an automated pipeline (Google Cloud Sensitive Data Protection, in the EU) redacts names, email addresses, phone numbers, street addresses, payment details and national identifiers. Analysis, reports and quotes read only the redacted text and refuse to run on text that has not been redacted.
-   Department-level output is withheld below five Respondents. The analysis engine refuses to analyse any group of fewer than five.
-   Every sentence of a finding cites the answers behind it, and the engine counts how many different people those answers came from.
-   A quote must appear, in order, in the person's original answer. Cuts are allowed, rewording is not. Quotes are 5 to 25 words, one per person. A quote that contained a redacted name is dropped. A separate check asks whether anyone could be recognised from the quotes, and if that check cannot pass, no quotes are kept.
-   No Customer sees a per-person score, risk flag or automated trigger, and the product makes or recommends no hiring, promotion, performance or disciplinary decision.

### Personal Agent

-   The Personal Agent answers from redacted, grouped evidence and respects the same floor of five.
-   It is instructed to show where every claim came from, to say when something is an interpretation, and never to identify or narrow down who said something.
-   Before an answer is shown, code checks it. It removes citations to sources that do not exist, quotes that do not appear word for word in the sources, figures the sources do not contain, and the names of people in the Company.
-   Personal Agent conversations are deleted after 30 days.

### Who can see what

-   **The Customer** sees who was invited and whether they took part, and the grouped findings and redacted quotes. Its data export contains no answers or transcripts.
-   **Spradley** can read individual answers in its own tools to run and support the service. Those reads are recorded in the audit log.

## 5\. Lines we do not cross

These are not weighed against anything.

-   No one's words reach their employer with their name attached.
-   Nothing is reported about a group small enough to point at someone.
-   We never present an invented voice as a real person's.
-   Our AI is disclosed as AI, never presented as a person.
-   We never help anyone identify, punish or pressure a Respondent for taking part or for what they said.

## 6\. Rules of use and enforcement

Spradley may be used to understand how work really is for a Company's people, and to make it better. **It may not be used against them.**

### A Customer, and anyone acting for one, may not

(a) **Try to identify who said what.** That includes cross-referencing quotes, timing or participation with what a manager knows, interviewing groups so small that answers point at a person, or asking Spradley for individual answers.

(b) **Retaliate.** No one may be treated worse for taking part, for declining, or for anything they said.

(c) **Use interviews for decisions about individuals.** No performance review, promotion, discipline, dismissal or redundancy decision may draw on what Spradley collected or on whether someone took part.

(d) **Surveil.** Spradley is not a tool for monitoring employees, their loyalty, their union activity, or their intent to leave.

(e) **Coerce participation.** Taking part is voluntary. A Customer may remind people that an interview is open. It may not require, reward or punish participation, or chase individuals who have not answered.

(f) **Misrepresent confidentiality.** A Customer may not tell its people that their answers are more private, or less private, than they are, or present Spradley as something it is not.

(g) **Impersonate Spradley or the Respondent.** No one may answer on someone else's behalf or alter what a Respondent said.

(h) **Bypass the product's protections.** No attempt to get around the group-size floor, the redaction, the consent screen or the limits on what data the product exposes.

### Enforcement

**Spradley reserves the right to control what is done with its tool, with the wellbeing of employees as the aim.** The basis is Principle 1: a tool that can be turned against the people it interviews has to be governed by the party that answers to them.

When we see, or are told about, use that breaks the rules of use, we act in proportion to the harm. From lightest to strongest, we may:

-   **Refuse** a request, an interview design or a feature that would break them.
-   **Restrict** a Customer's use: hold back a report, raise the group-size floor, pause new interviews.
-   **Suspend** the Customer's access while we look into it.
-   **End** the relationship.

We look into every report we receive, and we start by protecting the people who could be harmed, before the facts are settled. We never reveal who reported abuse, and we never reveal a Respondent's answers to resolve a dispute about them. Where the harm is serious, we may go straight to suspension or ending. We record what we decided and why.

### Reporting abuse

Anyone can report misuse of Spradley: a Respondent, a manager, an administrator at a Customer, or someone at Spradley. Write to [privacy@spradley.io](mailto:privacy@spradley.io). You do not need proof, and you do not need to give your name.

A person at Spradley who sees misuse must report it, whoever the Customer is. A Respondent may also complain to the Danish data protection authority, Datatilsynet, or to the authority in their own EU country, as our [data policy](https://spradley.io/data-policy) says.

## 7\. Where we fall short

Principle 3 asks us to write our gaps down. These are the places where the product does not yet fully keep what this document says. We will update this list as we close them.

(a) **Safety.** The safety check does not yet read every answer. It reads answers that lead to an AI follow-up question, so fixed questions and the last answer of an interview are not checked, and neither are the follow-ups our voice interviewer asks on its own. If the check itself fails, the interview continues. The help message is in English only.

(b) **Withdrawing.** Withdrawing consent before finishing deletes a Respondent's answers, but the interview screen has no button for it yet. After an interview is complete, withdrawal goes through the employer or privacy@spradley.io.

(c) **Erasure.** When an employee record is deleted, their name and email are removed, but the text of their past answers is kept for grouped analysis, both as written and redacted. Text as written can still contain names. A Respondent who wants their answers deleted too has to ask.

(d) **Quotes.** The short quotes a Respondent is shown and asked to approve at the end of an interview are selected by AI and may be lightly edited. The quotes in our reports are held to the stricter word-for-word rule.

(e) **Small groups.** The floor of five applies to departments and to the groups we analyse. A single qualitative finding inside a larger group can rest on one person's experience. Instead of a count, a separate check decides whether that person could be recognised from it.

(f) **Disclosure.** The AI is disclosed before every interview, and the voice interviewer is told to say it is an AI if asked. The text interviewer has no such instruction yet.

(g) **Explainability.** Voice conversations are not recorded step by step the way text interviews are. A few internal engineering views that show raw AI requests do not yet write a record to the audit log when someone opens them.

## 8\. On the word "constitution"

We call this a constitution because it does what a constitution does: it says what Spradley is for, whom it answers to, and what it will not do, and it ranks above every other instruction we give our AI or ourselves. It is not a contract and not a set of rules to apply mechanically. Where the words run out, the purpose decides, and the purpose is to protect the people who trust us with what they know.

It will change as we learn. Each version is dated, and we will say what changed and why.

Written by the three founders of Spradley: Miguel, Seb and Magnus.
